Please enable javascript to view this page in its intended format.
Photo by Matthew Gibson |
|
Climate change experts with members of the Queen's Environmental Law Association: Back row (l-r) Danielle Rode, Law '12; Kimberly Grange, Law '13; Steve Ronan, Law '12; Queen's Law Professor Bruce Pardy; Lawrence Solomon of Energy Probe; Queen's Biology Professor John Smol; Matthew Bramley of the Pembina Institute; Patrick Stratton, MA(Econ) '08/Law '11; Front row (l-r) Larry Wu, Law '13; Robert Woon, Law '13; Mally McGregor, Law '13; Stephanie Brown, Law '12; Matt Doak, Law '13; and Martha Monterrosa, Law '12. Missing: Nick Esterbauer, Law '13; George Evans, Law '13, Benjamin Grant, Law '13; Louise MacDonald, Law '13; and Justin Morrison, Law '13. |
Convocation Hall was at standing-room-only capacity on November 8, 2010, as students, professors and Kingston residents packed in tight for “The Great Climate Debate.” Presented by the Queen’s Environmental Law Association (QELA), the debate brought together four of Canada’s leading climate change experts to speak on both scientific and political aspects of the global warming discourse.
Photo by Greg Black |
|
Queen’s Biology Professor John Smol and Lawrence Solomon of Energy Probe |
Photo by Greg Black |
|
Matthew Bramley of the Pembina Institute and Queen’s Law Professor Bruce Pardy |
The policy debate was still more heated, with Matthew Bramley, director of the Pembina Institute’s climate change program, arguing that the world desperately needs leaders to demonstrate that cleaning up our climate is possible. One of Canada’s most active climate change advocates, Bramley urged that the benefits of even a miniscule change by Canada would far outweigh the costs to achieve such change. “This argument is about doing the right thing,” he said. “All the other side has given us is a rationale for doing nothing,” he added in a reference to Queen’s Law Professor Bruce Pardy’s claim that action by Canada towards reducing emissions will have no influence on the international community.
“All countries act in their own self interest,” Pardy, an environmental law and policy expert, stated, before warning the audience, “Don’t be a doormat.” Instead, he argued, Canada must act in such a way that makes a significant international agreement possible.
A large contingent from Queen’s Backing Action on Climate Change was present at the debate, carrying signs that read “Polar Bears Can’t Swim Forever” and “Mother Earth is Angry.” When asked about the debate, a representative of the group emphasized the importance of open scientific discussion. Daniel Indacochea, MA ‘11, remarked, “there aren’t enough of these open debates. I really like the head-to-head format because they can call each other out on their arguments.”
Organizers were thrilled with the event’s success. QELA’s Patrick Stratton, MA(Econ) ‘08/Law ‘11, said, “the best part of this event was witnessing the passion of the Queen’s community. Students from multiple disciplines, faculty members and community members of all ages packed a theatre and showed that they care about understanding the issue of climate change and the implications of Canada’s actions.”
Watch a recording of the Debate (Answer NO to a Security Warning pop-up. If video does not play, install Adobe Flash Player)
Photo by Greg Black |
|
Dean Bill Flanagan, host and moderator |
Photo by Matthew Gibson |
|
Students, faculty and Kingston community members packed Theological Hall to watch the debate. |